AX TRANSFORMATION · FDE
byteforce goes on-site as a Forward-Deployed Engineer, working directly inside your organization. Instead of handing over a report and leaving, we build, deploy, and stay on through operations for a while. Enterprise-wide transformation doesn't end on a slide — it ends in a system that actually runs.
AX · Why tools alone aren't enough
It's easy to think a license and a model finish the transformation. But what changes is the tool, not how the work actually gets done. People keep the same flow they had yesterday, and the automation stays a tab nobody opens. byteforce isn't in the business of selling tools — we rebuild how the work happens and the system that runs it, together. Consultants hand over a report and leave; byteforce writes production code directly on your infrastructure and stays on through operations.
Rollout process · Five gates you can stop at
We don't commit to an enterprise-wide rollout up front. Diagnosis → Design → PoC → Deployment → Operations — five stages, each ending in a Go/No-Go gate. Whether to move forward is a decision we make together, based on results. Contracts run stage by stage, so if you stop, it ends cleanly at that point. The first gate, diagnosis, carries no contractual obligation — we look at the situation first, and decide whether to proceed after.
In plain termsWe don't lock you into one big contract up front. At each stage, you decide whether to continue based on the results.
Each gate is its own contract — stop, and it's only for that stage.
AX · All cases
Unlike the home page, which highlights representative cases only, this table lists all 9 — 6 delivered and operating, plus work still being verified or done alongside clients.
Live 4 · Delivered 1 · Built · for sale 1 · Pilot 1 · Open 1 · Advisory 1
| Case | Details | Status |
|---|---|---|
| IRO Atlas | Global SaaS · auth·infra·zero-downtime migration·AI reviewIRO Atlas verification metrics — cumulative migrations 31 · data loss 0 | Live |
| HEAVY MATCH | Heavy-equipment dispatch · 3-stage assignment·auto fee splitHEAVY MATCH platform acquisition inquiry | Built · for sale |
| Suntaek | E-commerce ops SaaS · ordering·settlement automation·AI advisor | Live |
| BeautyBook | Booking·CRM·treatment SaaS · piloting at 2 Gangnam stores | Pilot |
| aeo.io.kr | AI visibility optimization (AEO) · question dictionary·visibility index·free tools | Live |
| woollim | AI experience studio · QR-start AI onboarding for cities & schools | Live |
| NAISSER | SaaS prototype | Delivered |
| ORPHEUS | Rare-disease drug repurposing multi-agent · 4th AI Drug Discovery Competition entry | Open |
| The Seoul Institute | Future Space Research Lab · AI urban-planning analysis system design advisory | Advisory |
WORKED EXAMPLES
If the case cards above stop at what a project left behind, here we pick two and lay out exactly how work that was scattered before adoption became a single flow after it. We're not listing numbers here — just showing what connects to what, as nodes and arrows. Steps a person once copied by hand became connections inside the system.
HEAVY MATCH used to handle dispatch request, vehicle assignment, job confirmation, fee calculation, and settlement as separate manual steps. After adoption, a request triggers the 3-stage dispatch to run end to end, with fees split automatically at each stage all the way through settlement.
Fee calculation → settlement runs through automatic, stage-by-stage distribution.
선택 used to track ordering, settlement, revenue, and inventory alerts across separate screens. Now ordering and settlement are automated, and a revenue dashboard, AI advisor, and KakaoTalk alerts come together in one operating view.
Dotted = manual step · Solid arrow = automatic flow · Amber dot = live signal · Amber glow = after adoption
AI GOVERNANCE · AUDIT TRAIL
Getting the system running was the story up to this point. Inside an enterprise, the next question is the one that stalls sign-off — what this AI is allowed to see and do, who sets that boundary, and what gets recorded if something goes wrong. byteforce doesn't stop at building the system — we layer policy, control, and audit on top of it, so the items a security or infosec review will ask about are already built in.
Active evidence · Low-friction start
A security or infosec review looks at who's doing the work. byteforce is a team that has completed 14 official Anthropic courses. That means the team designing your policy and controls holds an official Claude credential — not an outside vendor bolting on generic tools. Technical vulnerability assessments and re-checks with every deploy are handled by the same team at Security Center, so you don't have to commission governance (what's allowed) and security (what's actually exploitable) separately. Even deciding where the control and audit layers go starts with diagnosis, not a locked-in contract.
Scope and timeline depend on your specific situation. Tell us what's happening first.